In partnership with

Dear readers,

This Wednesday we look at one of the more interesting questions facing Southeast Europe's innovation ecosystem: can tokenization finally help bridge the region's long-standing capital gap? Through a conversation with T-Blocks co-founder Henri Ndreca, we explore why blockchain alone isn't enough, how Luxembourg is becoming a gateway for cross-border investment, and why diaspora capital could be one of the region's biggest untapped opportunities.

We also unpack a growing sentiment among founders and investors that even the region's most mature startup ecosystems are beginning to lose momentum, prompting an increasing number of entrepreneurs to establish a US presence much earlier in their journey.

Finally, we share a top marketer’s take on why many SEE startups still struggle to tell compelling stories despite building world-class products, and what founders can learn from Silicon Valley about turning technical excellence into narratives that attract customers, investors, and attention.

Happy reading!
Bojan Stojkovski
Editor-in-Chief, IT Logs

Why nobody is tokenizing the Balkans yet, and why that could soon change 

Eni Shtini and Henri Ndreca

For years, Southeast Europe has faced the same structural problem: the region has valuable assets, ambitious entrepreneurs and investment opportunities, but connecting those opportunities with global capital remains difficult.

Across the Balkans, companies are building real estate projects, renewable energy developments, infrastructure projects and businesses with international potential. Yet many of these opportunities still rely on local banks, domestic investors or rare diaspora financing because international investors often hesitate to enter markets they do not know well.

In recent years, blockchain and tokenization have often been presented as a possible solution for this challenge. By representing ownership rights in an asset as a digital token, the technology promises to make investments easier to distribute and potentially open access to new groups of investors.

However, Henri Ndreca, co-founder of Luxembourg-based digital investment infrastructure company T-Blocks, believes the industry has learned an important lesson after several years of experimentation: technology is not the first step. “The main thing that the region needs is more financial structures rather than tokenization,” Ndreca says, beginning his own story of why he is in this business today.

Henri Ndreca (on the right)

Ndreca has followed the evolution of blockchain from its early days, when the technology was mostly associated with cryptocurrencies and speculation, to the current phase where banks, asset managers and institutional investors are exploring how digital infrastructure can reshape financial markets.

His interest in the space started before tokenization became a mainstream topic. He was among the early voices discussing crypto-economics in Albania, authoring one of the country’s first academic theses on the topic and later translating The Bitcoin Standard into Albanian, one of the first major books about cryptocurrency and monetary systems available in the language. He also co-founded Crypto Friends Podcast, one of Albania’s first Web3 educational platforms, and has advised startups, regulators and digital finance initiatives across the region.

Today, through T-Blocks, Ndreca is focused on a different application of blockchain: using it as infrastructure to help emerging-market assets reach international investors.

The company started with a focus on Albania and the Balkans, aiming to help local asset managers, developers and businesses create investment products that could reach international investors. Now, it provides infrastructure for structuring, issuing and distributing financial instruments, combining traditional finance with blockchain-based distribution channels.

However, its experience in the region changed the way it looked at tokenization. The original assumption was that blockchain could solve the capital access problem directly. Instead, the company discovered that the bigger challenge was building trust.

“The thing that asset managers in these countries didn’t quite understand is that what solves their problems more is the trust that we can help them get from our Luxembourg vehicle,” Ndreca tells IT Logs.

For T-Blocks, Luxembourg became a critical part of the model because of its reputation as one of the world’s strongest jurisdictions for cross-border investments and financial products. “We chose Luxembourg because it is the best cross-border capital jurisdiction in the world. This is where financial transactions happen,” he explains.

The idea is relatively simple: global investors are often reluctant to invest directly into a local special-purpose vehicle or project in a smaller emerging market. But if that same opportunity is structured through a recognised financial jurisdiction, supported by compliance processes, auditors and established institutions, it becomes easier to evaluate.

Henri and Eni

“They don’t invest in an Albanian SPV. They need to have that feeling of security. They need to know there are auditors, banks and trusted institutions behind it.” he emphasizes.

This has become one of the biggest lessons for T-Blocks. “The foundation in everything that we do with all countries is: do you have a legal structure in a trusted jurisdiction? Do you have that sense of credibility that global investors, foreign allocators, family offices and funds want?” Ndreca recalls.

From crypto speculation to institutional finance

The change in T-Blocks thinking shows a broader change happening across the blockchain industry.

For years, blockchain was mostly associated with cryptocurrencies, speculative investments and digital assets disconnected from traditional finance. During the 2021 and 2022 boom, thousands of projects raised money through token sales, while venture investors poured billions into blockchain infrastructure.

Source: T-Blocks

Much of that activity, however, failed to create sustainable value. Ndreca believes the industry has now entered a different phase, where the focus is moving away from speculation and towards financial applications with real-world use cases.

“When we first started, people in the region had a very bad perception of tokenization because they always thought of it as Bitcoin and crypto.” he tells IT Logs.

That perception influenced how T-Blocks approached companies and the startup eventually changed its messaging. “We started to not mention tokenization at all towards clients.” Our language was about gathering capital, raising money for projects, and structuring it in Luxembourg.”

The wider market, however, began changing rapidly as major financial institutions entered the space. “When BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton and all the big companies started talking about tokenization, it changed the credibility of the industry,” Ndreca says.

The biggest signal was that some of the world’s largest asset managers were no longer discussing blockchain as an experiment, but as a new layer for financial infrastructure. Today, the first wave of tokenization is focused on assets that already have strong demand and established markets.

“What is being tokenized is stablecoins, US Treasuries, money market funds and some of the largest funds in the world.” The reason is simple: trust and liquidity. “These are the lowest-hanging fruits because they are easier to sell and easier to transact.” 

The next stage, Ndreca believes, will be much more ambitious. “Later, down the risk curve, you get more exotic assets from non-US markets (for example, the Balkans, from Saudi Arabia, from Africa and other emerging markets),” he says.

Henri and Eni with clients

This is where SEE could eventually become relevant. Many assets in the region are considered too small, too complex or too unfamiliar for international investors. Tokenization could create another distribution layer, but only if the underlying financial structures already exist. The lesson from the last few years is that blockchain does not replace traditional finance, but instead extends it.

Southeast Europe’s diaspora capital opportunity

One of the biggest opportunities for the Balkans could come from diaspora capital.

Countries such as Albania, Kosovo and N. Macedonia have millions of citizens living abroad. While many of them maintain economic connections with their home countries, converting that connection into investment has historically been difficult.

The challenge is not only finding investors, but creating investment opportunities they trust. T-Blocks experienced this first-hand in Albania. Last year, the company presented its model to Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, the country’s minister of economy and around 50 real estate developers.

The discussion was not focused on blockchain. “We explained how these developers can attract foreign money, global money and diaspora money. But it needed to be safe, compliant, transparent and built according to international standards.” Ndreca recalls.

Furthermore, he notes that the meeting showed that local businesses need to think beyond individual projects and focus on financial architecture. “The Prime Minister understood very quickly that developers need to think about financial structures. Without having these international structures, it is very hard to attract money.

Following that meeting, T-Blocks evaluated several projects and selected one developer for a pilot. The company helped structure a process that allowed diaspora investors to participate in a real estate development in southern Albania.

Interestingly, blockchain was not the key element. “We didn’t want to include tokenization because, at the end, what solved the problem was the trust layer, the infrastructure and the Luxembourg paper that we created.”

The experience reinforced an important point: tokenization is not a replacement for financial systems, but it functions as an additional tool built on top of them. For the Balkans, Ndreca believes diaspora mobilisation could become one of the strongest use cases. “The biggest value tokenization can bring is diaspora mobilisation of capital.”

Blockchain’s second act will be built on utility

Looking at the evolution of blockchain over the past several years, Ndreca believes the industry has reached a turning point. The speculative era is fading, while practical applications are becoming more important.

Source: T-Blocks

“You don’t have space anymore to do nonsense in crypto. That era is over.” Ndreca notes, emphasizing that investors are now rewarding projects that solve real problems. “What investors are rewarding right now are projects with real utility. Projects that bring assets and solve problems in the real world.”

For SEE, that could mean a gradual shift in how companies think about raising capital and how investors access opportunities. However, the region still needs preparation.

Ndreca believes only a small number of companies in the Balkans are currently ready for institutional tokenization. “You can count the companies that are fit for this kind of innovation with one hand. There are not many companies that have the corporate structures, governance, boards, cash-flow transparency and reporting,” he adds. 

Henri and Eni with clients

The opportunity exists, but it will not happen overnight. While tokenization will not magically solve SEE’s investment challenges, it could become another layer of infrastructure that helps trusted assets reach investors who were previously unable to access them.

“The industry does not need more speculation. It needs more assets, more value and more real-world use cases coming on-chain.” Ndreca concludes.

Across the region…

  • Bulgarian startup Nanogram, an AI-powered social gaming platform where users can instantly create and share short, interactive video games, has raised €1.91 million from a group of international investors. The round was led by Ohio-based Drive Capital, which invested approximately €435K alongside Bulgarian venture capital firm LAUNCHub Ventures with a €780K investment and Polish fund Inovo Venture Partners.

  • Croatian space tech startup Genesis Space Flight Laboratories has raised €1.2 million in funding from GapMinder Venture Partners and Fil Rouge Capital. The investment will support the development of its reusable capsule technology, the launch of its first commercial missions, and the expansion of the company’s operations as it works to make microgravity research more accessible worldwide.

  • Croatian legal tech startup Yure.ai has received backing from Zagreb-based fund AYMO Ventures to further develop its AI platform for legal professionals. The company is building a solution designed to simplify legal research and drafting, allowing lawyers to complete tasks that traditionally require hours of reading and analysis in a fraction of the time.

Thinking about hiring globally? Start with an EOR.

The best person for your next role might not live near your office—or even in the same country.

More companies are realizing they don't need to open entities everywhere just to access global talent. Instead, they're using EOR to hire internationally faster, stay compliant, and avoid building local infrastructure before they're ready.

Oyster's EOR helps companies hire, pay, and support employees in 180+ countries while Oyster handles payroll, compliance, taxes, and local employment requirements.

Rumor has it…

  • A growing sentiment among founders and investors is that even the region's strongest startup ecosystems have begun to plateau. Innovation hasn't stalled, but late-stage funding, major exits, and access to global customers haven't kept pace. As a result, more founders are looking to the US earlier, establishing a presence from day one to tap deeper venture capital markets, win customers faster, and accelerate global growth.

    Got tech rumors? Ping us at [email protected]

The Ecosystem take… 

Antonija Bilic Arar, developer marketer & content strategist

IT Logs: What separates a compelling startup story from a good marketing pitch?

Antonija Bilic Arar: Dry facts rarely attract attention, that's simply the fact. People are interested in a story, people love hearing or reading about other people, not about companies or software products. All of us, whether we're aware of it or not, love a story that has a protagonist, a challenge or an obstacle, then a solution, and a happy ending.

On the other hand, it makes no sense to invent some fairy-tale founding stories if they simply don't exist. Sometimes it's perfectly fine to say, We noticed a business problem and wanted to solve it. There's no point in trying to make a protagonist out of a founder who doesn't have that in them. What matters is recognizing which narrative suits the founder and the business best, polishing it well, and then telling it consistently. A hundred times, a thousand times, and then several thousand times.

IT Logs: Do startups from SEE struggle to tell their stories differently than founders in Western Europe or the US?

Absolutely and 100% yes! I first encountered that argument a couple of years ago when talking to a local founder who was trying to raise a significant funding round from the US VC funds. He came prepared, with numbers backing his claims about the product's growth and usage. After talking to dozens of investors and not securing the funding, he told me that he has learned a valuable lesson: one of the main deciding factors for US VC to invest is FOMO. Fear of missing out on investing in the next big thing. And saying, ‘We have 5 enterprise customers’ or ‘We have 1 million users’ or ‘We have 30,000 GitHub stars,’ however impressive, does not give FOMO. It says nothing about the big picture, the founder’s conviction, or the bold vision.

I have also experienced it firsthand, working mostly with dev tool startups in the last several years. Dev tool startup means founders are software engineers and focused on solving the engineering problem they’ve encountered themselves. Local CEE engineers turned founders focus on building the best product and solving the most challenging technical problem and, more often than not, think that that is enough to be chosen by their fellow engineers. Marketing and promotion are seen as second-grade priorities compared to engineering. They usually hire for marketing or sales as an afterthought, and usually because that’s something VCs or mentors have been telling them they have to do, but they don’t want to do that themselves.

Marketing is seen as something cringe, lame, and almost a dirty word when it comes to local engineers turned founders. They want to stay away as much as possible from posting on social media (You’re not going to tell me that I have to become a ‘thought leader,’ are you?!). And I’ve heard that from founders who were opinionated and had something to say!

There is no better person to be the face of the company and tell a compelling and convincing story than the founder(s). There’s no other person to get out there on Twitter, Reddit, or LinkedIn and sell the solution, however technical it is! It doesn’t have to be LinkedIn thought leadership, if that’s too cringe - in that case, go and engage in the communities where the technical debates are taking place.

IT Logs: Why is translating technical excellence into a compelling narrative still a challenge for SEE startups?

We in Eastern Europe are simply raised to be (self-)critical and reserved in praise. We think that what we do has to be extraordinary for us to boast about it, so a lot of people don't dare tell their story and speak publicly about what they're doing, because they themselves feel it's "nothing special." I was recently amused by a tweet that said it wanted an AI code review tool trained on code reviews from Eastern European engineers, because that would mean the comments would be short, clear, sharp, and without any sugarcoating.

In a business culture like that, it's genuinely hard to be a storyteller of yourself and your own startup. There's perhaps also a bit of an inferiority complex at play here, or impostor syndrome. It's much easier to be convinced that you're the one disrupting the industry, that you've built a better solution than the incumbents, and to confidently communicate that to the world from Silicon Valley than from Zagreb!

That said, I do see that the AI craze has changed this somewhat. It hasn't so much changed local founders themselves, but rather the sheer volume of products, tools, and startups has forced founders everywhere to be louder and more creative in order to stand out in all that noise.

As an example, I'd point to the Twitter activity of Ivan Burazin, co-founder of Daytona, who mixes in stories from his personal life, growing up in Croatia, experiences from past (non-)successes among tweets about AI infrastructure and sandboxes, and adds occasional hot takes, purposely provocative statements, that definitely grab attention. ;) 

Upcoming events in the region…

Editor’s pick

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading